City Council delays $121M budget vote amid public pushback
Williamsburg leadership will hear proposed changes from staff, as well as details about city’s debt
This email was sent to paid subscribers only. Thank you for supporting independent reporting and analysis like this.
Facing public questions about debt, staffing growth, and the true tax impact on homeowners, the Williamsburg City Council has postponed its previously scheduled May 14 budget vote to a Special Called Meeting at 9:00 a.m. on Wednesday, May 27, 2026. The delay creates space for additional discussion, including a presentation from the City’s independent financial advisors. A Work Session is set for Monday, May 11, at 4:00 PM at the Stryker Center, 412 N. Boundary Street, where Interim City Manager Michele Mixner DeWitt and Chief Financial Officer Barbara Dameron will review revisions to the proposed budget that emerged after the plan was published March 30, 2026.
The City’s independent financial advisors, Davenport and Company, will also present, addressing public questions about the City’s debt portfolio. Davenport representatives have appeared before City Council twice already this year, at the Budget Retreat on February 13 and at the regular City Council Meeting on March 12. Their May 11 appearance marks a third briefing, prompted by questions raised during the public input period. Davenport has characterized the City’s overall debt position as sound, with borrowing levels well within self-imposed policy limits and top-tier credit ratings from both Moody’s and S&P. A detailed summary of the firm’s findings appears below.
Watch the Davenport presentation from the City Council’s Board Retreat on February 13:
Pushback to proposed budget
Residents raised concerns during the public input period across multiple themes throughout the budget planning process:
Staffing growth: Several speakers questioned the proposal to add 14 new full-time positions, noting that the City’s workforce has grown from 192.5 employees in 2016 to a proposed 254.5. Concerns centered on the long-term sustainability of that growth, the adequacy of justification for the new roles, and whether new hires should be deferred until a permanent City Manager is appointed.
Property tax framing: Public commenters pushed back on the characterization of the real estate tax rate as flat, arguing that rising property assessments will result in an effective tax increase for many homeowners regardless of the unchanged rate of $0.62 per $100 of assessed value.
Tourism tax impact: Some speakers cautioned that high taxes on meals, lodging, and admissions could discourage consumer spending, citing concerns that elevated tax rates may affect visitor behavior and reduce the tourism-driven revenue the City relies on.
Debt and capital spending: Multiple commenters raised concerns about the pace of new borrowing and questioned whether Capital Improvement Plan expenditures should be reduced rather than new taxes introduced to fund operations. Allegations were also presented that approximately $9.8 million in CIP line items had been increased without proper City Council appropriations since FY25, and separately, questions were raised about whether a $5 million payment for a music venue was properly authorized and subject to public hearings.
Operating budget
The proposed budget totals $121,154,362 across six funds, with the General Fund representing the core operating budget at $56 million. The budget is structurally balanced, meaning recurring revenues like property taxes, utility fees, and meals taxes are sufficient to cover ongoing operating costs without drawing on one-time sources. The real property tax rate holds flat at $0.62 per $100 of assessed value, but real estate assessed values are expected to rise an average of 5.22% overall, or 4.8% excluding new construction, with residential properties seeing an average increase of 3.8%, meaning many homeowners will pay more in property taxes even without a rate change. The overall budget is 17% larger than last year.
Revenue sources and fees
Revenue growth for FY27 is driven largely by the first full year of higher meals and lodging tax rates, rising assessed property values, a new admissions tax, utility tax, and business license revenue. The 10% admissions tax, implemented January 1, 2026, applies only to the first $10 of any admission charge, creating a $1 per-ticket cap, and is projected to generate $900,000. Adjusted meals and lodging tax rates are expected to produce an additional $1.5 million and $800,000, respectively. The budget also proposes a 7% utility rate increase, raising the water rate from $6.89 to $7.37 per 1,000 gallons consumed, which is expected to add approximately $2.88 to the average monthly residential bill.
Spending priorities and trade-offs
Public Safety receives the largest General Fund allocation at $18 million, followed by Education at $14.5 million and General Government Administration at $10.9 million. The budget adds 14 new full-time equivalent positions across Public Works and Utilities, Police, Fire, Parks and Recreation, the City Manager’s Office, Planning and Codes Compliance, and the Commissioner of the Revenue. Among the requests left unfunded are $721,000 that would have supported the Williamsburg Redevelopment and Housing Authority without federal assistance, an additional $233,000 sought by Williamsburg-James City County Schools, $148,000 for new outside agency applicants, and 9.5 requested positions across several departments.
Personnel costs
The budget allocates $1.1 million for personnel cost increases. Of that amount, $680,000 covers higher taxes, insurance, and benefit costs, while $420,000 funds a cost-of-living adjustment, merit increases of up to 2%, and compensation adjustments from the biennial benchmarking process. The budget also includes recurring pay commitments: $210,000 for Police overtime, $220,000 for Fire overtime, $90,000 for Police discretionary leave, $36,000 in Fire Department retiree stipends, and $12,000 in Filter Plant retiree stipends.
Capital budget
The FY27 Capital Improvement Plan appropriation totals roughly $42 million, and the structure of that spending reflects a meaningful reliance on borrowing. The largest share goes toward City projects, with a portion set aside for debt service and the City’s share of school projects. Spending is projected to step down in subsequent years, with the five-year plan totaling $92 million in cumulative appropriations across FY27 through FY31. To understand the full price of that infrastructure program, Davenport modeled the long-term cost of the proposed borrowing using a conservative planning rate, projecting that the total combined cost of principal and interest over the life of those loans will reach approximately $118.6 million — nearly double the amount borrowed.
In presentations to City Council at the February 13 Budget Retreat and again at the March 12 City Council Meeting, Davenport characterized the City’s overall debt position as sound, noting that borrowing levels remain well within self-imposed policy limits and that the City holds top-tier credit ratings from both Moody’s and S&P. Total interest owed on existing obligations brings the current cost of borrowing to approximately $70 million when principal and interest are combined. To protect those ratings, Davenport has suggested scheduling in-person site visits with analysts from both agencies in summer 2026, noting that neither has conducted an on-site review of Williamsburg in several years.
Several major financing actions define the near-term borrowing plan:
Library financing: The City plans to borrow $26 million for the new downtown library, structured initially as a Bond Anticipation Note to be issued in late summer or fall 2026 and converted to permanent financing in FY30.
Police station takeout: The City faces a hard deadline in October 2026 to execute permanent financing for a Bond Anticipation Note tied to the police station. Once both the library and police station borrowings are permanently financed, Davenport projects annual debt service will rise but estimates it will remain below the City’s self-imposed planning limit even at the borrowing program’s projected peak.
2023 bond refinancing (complete): In March 2026, the City refinanced an existing bond through a competitive bid process, securing a lower fixed rate with Atlantic Union Bank and generating more than $1.1 million in projected savings over the life of the loan.
Separately, the City issued its first Water and Sewer Utility Revenue Bond, backed by utility user fees and outside the City’s general obligation debt capacity.
Davenport has advised maintaining the City’s reserve fund at its current elevated level as a buffer against downturns in tourism-driven consumption taxes — a risk the advisors consider material given how heavily the City relies on meals, lodging, and admissions revenue.
A Williamsburg Independent editor used official sources and AI tools to produce this report.
Other ways to support the Williamsburg Independent:
Buy me a coffee: ko-fi.com/williamsburgindependent
Tip on PayPal: paypal.com/ncp/payment/2L8DQJ62CWGRS
Go shopping: etsy.com/shop/dogstreetpress
Read a book: bookshop.org/shop/independentbookshop
Facebook: facebook.com/williamsburgindependent
Twitter: x.com/WburgIndie